From Perry Mason to Law and Order, from Anatomy of a Murder to My Cousin Vinny, courtroom drama remains a popular entertainment in American households; but, while we eagerly watch the proceedings in the court, we are rarely invited into the Jury Room where life-and-death decisions are often made.
Reginald Rose's compelling Twelve Angry Men [television, film, and stage versions] takes a different stance; the entirety of it is located in the Jury Room, where twelve men from an assortment of backgrounds, races, and ages convene to deliberate what went on at the trial, and must decide the fate of a 19-year-old reform school suspect accused of murdering his father. -- An updated version by Sherman L. Sergel, now entitled Twelve Angry Jurors to accommodate female jurors and their enhanced perspectives, is currently on offer in director Alex Rikerd's compelling production at the Way Off Broadway Theatre in Prattville.
At the outset, we hear a judge's "charge" to the jurors that their decision must be unanimous, that the decision must be made "beyond reasonable doubt", and that a guilty verdict will result in the death penalty.
So the drama begins: it's a hot day, only one window is open, the fan doesn't work, and the jurors are hot, tired, impatient, and short-tempered. To most of them it's an open-and-shut case, but one of them has doubts; and it will take a lot of sifting through the details of the evidence, and questioning the validity of some witnesses' testimonies in order to get unanimous agreement. At a time when there were no cellphones, internet, or AI, they must deliberate on their own.
Ms. Rikerd has a tight ensemble of actors at her disposal; though they are identified only by their Juror Number and not by name, their backgrounds, biases, and personalities become abundantly clear as the tensions rise moment by moment. -- The main contenders are Juror #8 [Scott Rouse] who first admits he has doubts about the perpetrator's guilt, and Juror #3 [Matthew Givens] who is adamant on both the guilt and for the jury to reach a quick unanimous verdict.
As their arguments heat up, evidence is re-considered, and several other jurors change their minds, audiences too might well change their own opinions. -- And while this creates a good deal of frustration, the play is not only about their ultimate verdict. In fact, perhaps the more interesting elements of Twelve Angry Jurors are about the jury process itself, a deliberation on what constitutes "reasonable doubt" and "justice", and a challenge to audiences to recognize their own beliefs.